<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Internet Marketer&#187; meta tags</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theinternetmarketer.com.au/tag/meta-tags/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theinternetmarketer.com.au</link>
	<description>Internet marketing commentary from Adelaide, Australia</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 01:43:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Keywords metatag died in 2002</title>
		<link>http://theinternetmarketer.com.au/keywords-metatag-died-in-2002/</link>
		<comments>http://theinternetmarketer.com.au/keywords-metatag-died-in-2002/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 08:32:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO Keywords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO Principles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meta tags]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theinternetmarketer.com.au/?p=285</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Keyword metatag This article dating back to 2002 (that&#8217;s correct 2002!) is just one of a plethora of articles and controlled SEO experiments that have shown the keyword metatag has no affect on Google. Unfortunately some folks just don&#8217;t get it. Perhaps its because the tag’s name suggest that’s what it does and its just [...]
No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal"><strong><span lang="EN-AU">Keyword metatag</span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-AU"><a href="http://searchenginewatch.com/216506" target="_blank">This article</a> dating back to 2002 (<strong>that&#8217;s correct 2002!</strong>) is just one of a plethora of articles and controlled SEO experiments that have shown the keyword metatag has no affect on Google.<br />
</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-AU">Unfortunately some folks just don&#8217;t get it. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-AU">Perhaps its because the tag’s name suggest that’s what it does and its just too damn temping to ignore it.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">If you&#8217;re paying for SEO services and they are getting stuck into your keywords metatag you&#8217;d be better off looking elsewhere for your SEO services.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">There, Ive said.  I feel better now.</p>
<p>No related posts.</p>
<p>Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://theinternetmarketer.com.au/keywords-metatag-died-in-2002/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

